Student voice
All students at 呻吟之王 (呻吟之王) and our collaborative partners are given the opportunity, and encouraged, to provide feedback on their educational experience. The views of students both individually and collectively help to inform university quality management systems.
There are a number of ways for students to make their views known and offer feedback on modules and programmes. The university provides an inclusive environment for student engagement irrespective of location, mode of study, teaching delivery or discipline.
The Student Charter, jointly produced by students, 呻吟之王 and staff, articulates the commitment for listening and responding to the student voice.
Students can also make their views known informally by visiting student advice centres, through discussions with tutors and by contacting the DSU.
-
Student representation
Students are engaged, both individually and collectively, as partners in the enhancement of their educational experience through student representation. The student representation structure aims to ensure that all students are represented.
Partnership with De Montfort Students鈥� Union (DSU)
The university and the work in partnership to own and manage student representation. DSU Executive Officers are members of various university committees to ensure that the student voice is represented at all levels of university governance.
Student voice and representation in academic quality processes
Student representatives are involved with university and faculty level committees and academic quality processes such as validation and periodic review as full committee or panel members. The DSU website provides useful information about our including how to find your course rep. DSU also have to support course reps with their training needs.
Student Voice Committees (SVCs) and Staff Student Consultative Committees (SSCCs)
The SVCs/SSCCs are an important student voice mechanism. The remit of the SVC/SSCC is to engage students in the enhancement of their educational experience and are designed to give student representatives, normally course reps, the opportunity to convey student views on a range of issues relating to their courses. For example, this may include what is working well, areas for enhancement and discussing any proposed changes with staff. The SVC/SSCC operational guidance, and SVC/SSCC issues log help to ensure meetings are run efficiently and scheduled in line with the relevant PMB.
-
Student participation in academic quality
Students are involved in academic quality processes, both in terms of providing feedback which may be used to inform decisions regarding programmes of study, but also directly through representation as a panel member.
Validation
Students play a key role in programme design and approval. New programme proposals are scrutinised by the relevant Programme Management Board (PMB), which includes student representation. Marketing staff seek students鈥� views on new programme proposals. A student representative is invited on to the validation panel (where unavailable, a member of the Executive will undertake this role). See validation guidance for student panel members.
Periodic review
Students and alumni are involved in five key ways during the periodic review process. Programme teams reflect on student views whilst writing their Self-Evaluation Document (SED) on which student commentary is also sought. A student representative is invited on to the review panel (where unavailable, a member of the DSU Executive will undertake this role). A group of students also meet with the panel on the day of review. See periodic review guidance for student panel members.
Collaborative provision
Student input is sought throughout all stages of collaborative partner approval and review. A member of the DSU Executive provides comment on the proposed new partners. A student representative is invited on to the validation or review panel (this will normally be member of the DSU Executive team).
Curriculum modification
Students are drivers of change. Feedback through student surveys and staff/student consultation can be one of the triggers for a programme leader to initiate change via the curriculum modification process. Changes can include revised assessments and weightings or learning outcomes. Any curriculum changes require support of the Programme Management Board or equivalent, and the wider faculty, including the Faculty Associate Professor (Quality).
Training for students representatives
Students and staff involved in academic quality assurance and enhancement processes have access to training and support provided by the university and the DSU.
-
Student charter
This charter has been created and is maintained jointly by 呻吟之王 staff and students. It sets out commitments from the university to students, from students to the university, and from the Students鈥� Union to students.
Starting with a blank sheet of paper, a group of students and staff set out the type of things they thought that they and the university should commit to. From teaching and learning, to support and university life, these ideas were refined into a single document.
That document was then updated and approved by the University Leadership Board, De Montfort Students' Union and the governing body, to create the 呻吟之王 Student Charter.
The charter will be updated on a yearly basis, and is a guide to your responsibilities at 呻吟之王, and will help explain what the university should do for you.
If you want to get involved with the development of the student charter, please email us for more information.
-
Student satisfaction surveys
A variety of mechanisms are employed to gather student feedback, including questionnaires and surveys. These are conducted both internally within 呻吟之王, and externally across the higher education sector.
呻吟之王 student surveys
Student surveys conducted internally within 呻吟之王 may include:
External student surveys
呻吟之王's Strategic Planning and Insight team are responsible for managing the university鈥檚 involvement in most external surveys including:
-
- for final year undergraduate students
- Students at collaborative colleges graduating with a foundation degree will be asked to complete the NSS
-
- (contact the Doctoral College)
Use of survey data
Where students鈥� views are captured by internal or external surveys, the data is used at the appropriate level within the university to inform improvement. Student feedback informs course improvements through Annual Enhancement Reviews or Collaborative Provision Programme Appraisal & Enhancement Plans (CP-PAE). These are considered by the Programme Management Board (PMB) and Faculty Academic Committee (FAC) with action plans devised as appropriate. Institutional level survey outcomes are used to inform debate and action at university committees.
-
Guidance and forms